With such attractive leads you’d think Friends with Benefits movie (2011) would be smart, sexy and laugh-out-loud funny. However, it doesn’t have any memorable or humorous lines, no chemistry between it’s two leads and none of it feels remotely real. The premise itself is quite interesting but it’s just another by-the-numbers romantic comedy.
The story: Dylan is an L.A.-based web-page genius who’s blog gets 6 million hits a day. Executive recruiter Jamie persuades Dylan to take a job as an art director at Gentleman’s Quarterly magazine in New York. Dylan is new to the city and he and Jamie quickly become friends. Both have been dumped by their respective partners and have sworn off relationships. Even though they like each other they decide to become friends with sexual benefits.
Pros:
Cons:
Loaded with product placement and similar to No Strings Attached but coarser, Will Gluck’s flat offering delivers nothing new. It’s as formulaic as the rom-coms it lampoons.
It starts out really fast paced with lots of banter back and forth to the point that it’s difficult to concentrate on the story. The characters aren’t very well realized, they try too hard to be witty and it’s difficult to believe in their relationship issues.
Justin Timberlake and Mila Kunis play emotionally damaged people and are great to look at but unfortunately have no chemistry. Timberlake is good in smaller roles like in The Social Network but he’s weak with the drama moments here and can’t carry the movie.
A predictable tale that ends up going nowhere, Friends with Benefits is ordinary and uninvolving. It wants to upend the romantic comedy genre but ends up falling back on the same tired conventions. Unromantic, bland and fake.
Oct 27, 18 05:25 PM
Aug 27, 18 04:13 PM
Aug 02, 18 03:13 PM
New! Comments
Have your say about what you just read! Leave me a comment in the box below.